Show the full module text

Module 23 — Parenting

The session that sorts which argument you are really having, prices the household work instead of counting it, and shortens the list the two of you hold completely.

The referral says you argue about the children, and the example is bedtime. One of you thinks the other gives in too easily; the other thinks the first is too rigid. This module walks through the session that works out which argument you are actually having.

The argument about the children

Summary: what happens in the session

1 Your therapist sorts the argument. A values difference, a capacity difference, or something about a child nobody has named.

2 The same question about assessments, put to both of you. Both answers go into the room.

3 The report, if one has already arrived. What it did to each of you, and to the two of you together.

4 The household list, priced. Everything, down to the group chat and the dentist, with a number beside each one.

5 The column that is not on the list. The noticing, remembering and deciding get a number of their own.

6 Two lists, and a sentence for the children. Four or five held completely, repair among them, and the rest free to differ openly.

The split this produces usually looks strange. A household where one person does four things and the other does eleven can be the even one.

Step 1. Which argument it is

Many couples arrive with the argument they have had for years, with different children in it. An hour on your values changes nothing at home, because only one of the three is settled that way.

A values difference is real, and rarer than couples think. The test is whether you can state your value without mentioning your partner’s failure.

A value, and what is not one. I want her to learn that effort is what we praise.

Which you would know if you ever did bedtime.

A capacity difference is the commonest, and nobody names it. One of you has nothing left by bedtime, and the giving-in that looks like a soft philosophy is a person out of fuel.

If the disagreement only exists after six, it is not a belief.

A child nobody has named sits under both, often: one who cannot start homework, who melts down at the school gate, who eats six things. Each of you has a theory, and each theory is about the other parent.

The time-of-day check. Do the two of you disagree about this at ten on a Saturday morning? No? Then one of you is trying to do it at the end of a day that has already taken everything.

Three things go in and one sentence comes out of the spout. That is how four years of it changes nothing.

Step 2. The assessment question

Early, before anyone gets back to bedtime, your therapist turns to both of you.

Asked of both parents. Has anyone ever suggested an assessment for any of your children, and what did each of you think when they did?

What usually comes back. One of you may have quietly believed it for years. The other may have heard it as an accusation and closed the subject down. Once both are out loud, what comes next is yours to decide together.

Step 3. If a report has arrived

Sometimes a child has already been assessed, and a parent reads the report and recognizes themselves in it. These traits run in families, so that is ordinary rather than a coincidence. The page lands on three people.

The parent in the report gets grief, relief and a rewritten childhood, usually over months. The other partner has lost the story they used to explain their spouse.

The story that no longer works. He is selfish.

She does not listen.

And the couple has lost both at once. Your therapist names that third part out loud, because it is what keeps a couple in the work.

Rings rather than a list, because the order is real: each one starts only after the one inside it has.

After the report, expect old incidents to be reopened on new terms, for years. Necessary work, one at a time, with a length agreed in advance and a way to stop.

An explanation accounts for a behavior; it does not erase what the behavior cost.

You can always say it. If any of this starts to feel like too much, you can say I am uncomfortable. That is a complete sentence. Nobody has to explain it or defend it. We stop, we look together at what is happening, and we decide as a group whether to stay with it or to understand first what is getting in the way.

Reopening one of those incidents often costs more than either of you expected.

The eighty percent figure. One of you may have been told that eighty percent of couples with an autistic child divorce. That figure has no basis. One study found the risk higher than a comparison group but nowhere near that,¹ and a national survey found no difference at all.²

Step 4. The list, priced

The second half of the session goes on the list: every job the household takes, then a number beside each, one to five, for what it costs the person doing it. Cost, not difficulty and not importance.

We price the work instead of counting it. The same job costs the two of you different amounts.

A five-minute call to the school office can be a four out of five for one of you. A two-hour tax return can be a one. Neither number is up for argument.

The counts come out almost even. The totals do not, and that gap is the argument.

Step 5. The column nobody wrote down

Then your therapist asks for one more number, for something that has never been on a chore chart. Mixed in with the rest of the list, it vanishes.

The invisible column. There is a job on this list that is not on the list. Somebody is holding the whole thing in their head: when the shoes stop fitting, when the form is due. What is that worth, out of five?

Then: what could move off that column by system, a shared calendar or a standing reminder, rather than by somebody trying harder?

The noticing is a job. Researchers who interviewed both partners about how a household runs found that the thinking part of housework is a distinct kind of work, unevenly shared.³ In our couples it lands on whichever partner has the more intact executive function, the planning and remembering part of the mind, regardless of who works more hours.

Worth knowing here: autistic mothers report more difficulty with multitasking and housework, and more often feel misunderstood by professionals.⁴ What they describe first, in their own words, is intense connection with their children.⁵ The hard part is the schools and the forms.

Step 6. Two lists, and the children

The session ends on the shortest list of the day: the handful where a difference between you is not survivable, written where the family can see it.

The short list. What are the four or five you both hold completely? The children can watch you disagree about the rest. What they need to watch is the coming back.

The way this goes wrong. Every parenting book says to present a united front, so couples do. One of you backs a rule you do not agree with, at seven in the evening. It holds two weeks, then collapses in a supermarket, and the collapse is read as a betrayal.

A performed unity is masking — acting a part for other people — applied to parenting. It costs the performing partner a great deal, and teaches a literal child that adults say things they do not mean. What we have found works is a list short enough to be real.

Deliberately a small circle and a large beach. Couples tend to reverse that, then quietly fail to hold most of it.

Everything not on that list also settles the fight we see most, about undermining. One parent sees a child out of capacity rather than defiant and adjusts; the other sees a rule dropped. Both are reasonable, so the difference gets said out loud, in front of the child.

What the research finds. What harms children is hostile, unresolved conflict, especially about them. Disagreement they watch being worked through goes with better outcomes, not worse.⁶

If you are ashamed of arguing in front of your children, the thing to change is not the arguing; it is that they never see the end of it.

After the session

Three things come out of it. The short list goes on a wall, plain enough for a child to read. The priced list will be wrong by Christmas. And the two answers about an assessment are in the open.

Our Invisible Load worksheet is where the noticing gets listed, and our Family Operating Manual is where the short list lives.

The one thing, if that is all you have. If all of this is too much this week, try the clock check on the argument you have most often. Knowing which of the three you are in is most of the work.

Your workbook

Your answers save to this device only - we cannot see a word of what you write. This one is the sort, the assessment question, your side of the priced list, and the four or five you both hold.

Which argument is it

Take the one you have most often. Run the time-of-day check before you answer.

The recurring argument, in one line

Honestly, which of the three is it? — A values difference - I can state mine without mentioning their failure, A capacity difference - it does not exist at the weekend, Something about our child that nobody has named, More than one of these, tangled

Has anyone ever suggested an assessment for any of your children, and what did you think when they did?

The list, priced

One to five for what it costs you. Cost, not difficulty and not importance.

Your five most expensive items, with the number beside each

The noticing, anticipating and remembering - who carries it? — Me, nearly all of it, My partner, nearly all of it, Split, roughly, We have never counted it

The short list

Four or five. Repair is one of them. Everything else may differ openly.

The four or five things you both hold completely

How repair happens when one of you gets it wrong, in one sentence

Where this comes from

Every source below was checked against the published record. They are grouped by the kind of evidence they are, so the numbers may not run straight down the page — a number points back to where the source is used in the lesson.

Research discussion

The three-way sort, the time-of-day check, the list priced by cost with the invisible column rated separately, and the short list and long list are practice moves. They were developed in use with neurodiverse couples and have not been tested in a trial. The research under them is real and indirect.

The two divorce studies disagree. The survival analysis¹ found 23.5 percent against 13.8 percent in a matched comparison group, with the difference concentrated in the years after childhood. The population study² found no difference in the odds of living with both parents across 77,911 interviews. They use different outcomes and different designs. The honest position is that the rate is somewhat elevated in some samples, that the timing finding is the more useful one, and that the eighty percent figure in circulation has no support in either.

The cognitive-labor study³ is 70 interviews across 35 American couples, qualitative, with a sample that skews educated and comparatively well-off. Its contribution is conceptual: it separates anticipating, identifying, deciding and monitoring, and shows they are distributed differently from the visible tasks. It says nothing about neurodivergence. The claim that the column tends to land on whichever partner has more intact executive function is a clinical observation and is not in the paper.

The survey of autistic mothers⁴ is 355 autistic and 132 non-autistic mothers, all with at least one autistic child, recruited online and self-selected. The interview study⁵ is nine mothers, analyzed phenomenologically; it is not a rate. They are cited together on purpose. Read alone, the first produces a deficit picture of autistic parenting that the second, and our own experience, do not support.

The marital-conflict review⁶ is general-population developmental research with no neurodivergent sample, and its findings are correlational.

Who this research was done with. The studies behind this module, none of them of neurodiverse couples, drew heavily on white, comparatively well-off, English-speaking participants. If your household carries pressures those samples did not — money, immigration, racism, disability, unsafe housing — the practice still applies, but the room you are practicing in is harder. That is the room, not you.

Peer-reviewed research

1. Hartley SL, Barker ET, Seltzer MM, Floyd F, Greenberg J, Orsmond G, Bolt D (2010) The relative risk and timing of divorce in families of children with an autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(4), 449-457. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019847 Survival analysis comparing 391 parents of a child with an autism spectrum disorder with a matched representative sample of parents of children without disabilities. The autism group had a higher rate of divorce (23.5 percent against 13.8 percent), and the risk remained high through the child's childhood, adolescence and early adulthood, whereas in the comparison group it declined after about age eight. Younger maternal age at the child's birth and later birth order predicted divorce in the autism group. Limitation: one longitudinal sample; a higher rate than a matched comparison group is not the 80 percent figure in circulation, and the population study below did not find a difference.

2. Freedman BH, Kalb LG, Zablotsky B, Stuart EA (2012) Relationship status among parents of children with autism spectrum disorders: A population-based study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(4), 539-548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1269-y Analysis of 77,911 parent interviews from the 2007 National Survey of Children's Health, including 913 parents reporting a child with an autism spectrum disorder aged 3 to 17. Controlling for relevant covariates, the authors found no evidence that children with autism were at increased risk of living in a household not comprised of their two biological or adoptive parents. Limitation: cross-sectional household composition at one point in time rather than a divorce rate over the life course, which is why it does not settle the question by itself.

3. Daminger A (2019) The cognitive dimension of household labor. American Sociological Review, 84(4), 609-633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419859007 Seventy in-depth interviews with both partners in 35 couples. The paper identifies cognitive labor as a distinct dimension of household work with four components: anticipating needs, identifying options, making decisions and monitoring progress. Women performed substantially more cognitive labor overall, with the largest gaps in anticipation and monitoring; decision-making, the component most closely tied to power, was shared more equally. Limitation: qualitative interviews with 35 American couples, skewed toward educated and comparatively well-off households; nothing about neurodivergence.

4. Pohl AL, Crockford SK, Blakemore M, Allison C, Baron-Cohen S (2020) A comparative study of autistic and non-autistic women's experience of motherhood. Molecular Autism, 11, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-019-0304-2 Community-based participatory survey of 355 autistic and 132 non-autistic mothers, each with at least one autistic child, co-developed with an advisory panel of autistic mothers. Autistic mothers reported significantly more difficulty with multi-tasking and domestic responsibilities and with creating social opportunities for their children, more often felt misunderstood by professionals and worried about being judged, and over 80 percent worried that disclosing their diagnosis would change professionals' attitudes; 96 percent reported putting their child's needs first and 85 percent found motherhood rewarding. Limitation: self-selected online survey with unequal group sizes; all participants were mothers of autistic children, so it says nothing about autistic parents generally.

5. Dugdale AS, Thompson AR, Leedham A, Beail N, Freeth M (2021) Intense connection and love: The experiences of autistic mothers. Autism, 25(7), 1973-1984. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211005987 Interpretative phenomenological analysis of semi-structured interviews with nine autistic mothers of children aged 5 to 15. Mothers described intense connection and adoration for their children and an instinctive understanding of their needs, often attributed to shared wiring, alongside being misunderstood, judged and dismissed by professionals who did not recognize autism in adults, and services unable to consider parent and child together. Limitation: nine participants; qualitative and not a prevalence estimate.

6. Cummings EM, Davies PT (2002) Effects of marital conflict on children: Recent advances and emerging themes in process-oriented research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(1), 31-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00003 Review of process-oriented research on how marital conflict affects children, covering which conflict characteristics matter, the cognitive, emotional, social and physiological pathways involved, what moderates them, and how outcomes should be conceptualized. The distinction the lesson uses, between destructive and unresolved conflict and conflict that children see worked through, comes from this body of work. Limitation: a review of general-population developmental research; no neurodivergent samples, and the mechanisms are correlational.

Sort the argument before anybody tries to win it

The Neurodiverse Couples Counseling Center works with couples where one or both partners are autistic, ADHD or AuDHD. The parenting session sorts values from capacity from an unnamed neurotype, and prices the household work rather than counting it. Therapy for clients in California, coaching worldwide, all by telehealth. A first conversation costs nothing.

Talk with our team