Show the full module text
Module 21 — Money
Stop fighting about money and start understanding each other.
Watch first: the Module 21 video
A narrated video of about 4 and a half minutes in a layered paper-cut style in periwinkle and mint, opening and closing on the Neurodiverse Couples Counseling Center logo. It walks through the session’s seven steps: each partner filling in the worksheet alone, an “Our Money Styles” chart (now-brain or future-brain, saver or spender, tracker or automator, and “Neither Side Is Better”), the family history behind each style, “I’m just bad with money” reread as a missing system, what each style protects, “Where We Clash, and the Translation,” a three-part money system with a shared pool and a check-in threshold, and a shared money-why. A couple sits at home in two armchairs with their therapist on a laptop screen.
Watch the Module 21 video: Money (MP4, about 5 minutes). The written lesson below covers the same ground in full.
Money fights are rarely about money. Underneath, they are about trust: whether you can count on each other, and talk about money without a fight. They are also about safety, freedom, and what each of you learned money means, long before you met.
Two money brains, one system
Summary: what usually happens in the session
1 The worksheets, filled in alone. Two Money Brains, One System, and if you have time, My Money Story.
2 Our money styles. Each of you checks what fits, then writes one sentence.
3 Where mine came from. What money felt like growing up, and the story it left you with.
4 What my style is protecting. What your way with money is really trying to give you.
5 Where we clash, and the translation. What your partner does, what you make it mean, and what it might actually be.
6 A system with room for both. One example among many. We are not financial planners; we help you talk it through and find what fits.
7 Our shared money why. One thing you both want your money to do.
Steps 2 to 7 are the worksheet's sections, in its order. No budget is built, and no bank statements come out. Underneath it all, the work is about trust and communication. One way this session can go, not a script. Your therapist will shape it to the two of you and to their own way of working.
Step 1. The worksheets, filled in alone
This session is built on one worksheet, Two Money Brains, One System. Each of you fills it in alone, before the session, without comparing answers. If you have time, fill in My Money Story as well; your therapist draws on it in step 3.
Step 2. Our money styles
The first section asks each of you three things. Are you more of a now-brain, who spends to feel alive, or a future-brain, who only feels safe with a plan? More saver or more spender? Do you like to track every penny, or automate it and forget? Then it asks for one sentence about how you relate to money.
In the session, each of you reads your sentence aloud, or hands over the page, and your partner says it back.
Most people sit somewhere between the two ends, and a style can shift with stress, sleep or a hard month. The pairs are for noticing yourself, not for sorting each other.
In one study, adults with ADHD more often called their money decisions avoidant or spontaneous.1 In interviews, some autistic adults described a strong drive to stay in control.2 But either of you can run either way, and an AuDHD partner can be a saver on Monday and a spender on Friday.
Neither of you is the responsible one, and neither of you is the fun-ruiner.
Step 3. Where mine came from
The second section asks what money felt like growing up. Money styles usually start as survival strategies. A child in a house where money ran out learns to watch it. A child in a house where nobody talked about it learns not to look.
My Money Story goes further. It starts with the lines that stuck: we can’t afford that, money is stress, we don’t talk about it. Then it asks about your money scripts, the beliefs that run in the background, usually learned in childhood.3 Money is always about to run out. Spending soothes. If I ignore it, it isn’t real.
The years before anyone had an explanation. Many neurodivergent adults struggled with money for years before they knew why: the overdraft at twenty-four, the letters left unopened. Those years leave self-blame behind, and sometimes grief. The worksheet asks what not knowing cost you, and what you can put down to your wiring rather than your character.
Your therapist invites the two of you to lay your stories side by side and say what you notice: the saver whose parents lost a house, the spender who grew up where nothing was allowed. Any memory can be passed over, or written down instead of said.
Most of a money story is written before you can argue with it. The last line is often the one carried longest.
Step 4. What my style is protecting
The third section asks what your money style is trying to give you. For a saver it is often safety; for a spender, aliveness or relief. This is the deepest part of the session.
To the spender, about one purchase. When you bought it, what were you feeling, about ten minutes before? Not why. What were you feeling.
To the saver. What would it feel like if you stopped checking, just for a week?
If a feeling word will not come, a body word will do: tired, buzzing, flat. The saver’s fear may be old, from step 3, or current: a partner who has covered missed bills for years is often exhausted, and that belongs in the room too.
You can always say it. If any of this starts to feel like too much, you can say I am uncomfortable. That is a complete sentence. Nobody has to explain it or defend it. We stop, we look together at what is happening, and we decide as a group whether to stay with it or to understand first what is getting in the way.
Both questions are asked with your partner sitting right there.
The same behavior, read from the other side of the room, looks like a character flaw. From inside, it is doing a job.
Step 5. Where we clash, and the translation
The fourth section is a table with three columns: what my partner does, what I make it mean, and what it might actually be.
In the session, each of you reads one row you wrote about the other. Then the partner the row is about says whether the third column fits. You are the expert on your own behavior.
The middle column is where the fight lives. The third column is a guess until your partner says whether it fits.
Why a money question can land so hard. For a partner who is highly sensitive to rejection, “What was that charge?” can land as an accusation before the sentence is over. “Why Did You Spend That?” is the worksheet for that moment.
Being checked on can lead to hiding. In studies of hiding money from a partner, the driver was expected disapproval: people who expected to be questioned spent anyway, and hid it.4 The hiding usually does more damage than the spending did.
Step 6. A system with room for both
Only now does the session turn to structure, starting with one question.
One system among many. We do not do financial planning, and there is no one right system. The one below is an example, one of many that work. Our job is to help the two of you talk it through and find what fits both of your brains. What makes any system work is trust, and being able to talk about money without a fight.
The question about access. If you wanted to look at everything tomorrow, every account, every balance, every debt, could you? Today, without asking anyone?
It is asked again in each of your individual sessions, where a no can be said privately.
If the answer is no. A no is often simple: one of you took over the accounts years ago, and the other stopped looking. Then the first job is making everything visible to both. If money is being used as leverage, or either of you is afraid of the other, tell your therapist alone; joint sessions pause until you are safe. When Money Is Used to Control is the worksheet to read first.
Once both of you can say yes, you talk through how to set things up. The worksheet’s fifth section offers one example: ours, for shared bills and goals, open to both of you; and mine and yours, fun money spent with no questions asked.
Your check-in number. If you use one, you pick a number together. Above it, you talk before you buy. Set it high enough that nobody is asking permission for groceries.
One example among many, not the one we recommend. The shared jar suits a future-brain and the side jars a now-brain; what matters is that you both chose it.
The accounts and due dates have worksheets of their own, below. Some money trouble needs more than a system: spending in bursts with little sleep, gambling, or debt that has become frightening. Then your therapist may suggest a doctor or a nonprofit credit counselor as well.
Step 7. Our shared money why
The last section asks for one thing you both want your money to do for the life you are building. Not a figure: a quiet room, a trip every year, the lean months covered.
Your therapist pairs it with the last page of My Money Story, the story I am choosing now. Each of you says one belief about money you want to carry forward, and your partner says it back.
You do not have to become one money brain. You build a system you both chose, with a seat for each of you in it.
The way this goes wrong. The session turns into a budget meeting. The numbers take over, the translation gets skipped, and the new system is built on the old meanings, so it soon gets used as evidence. The system comes last, after each of you has heard what the other’s money is protecting.
After the session
Your therapist’s notes from the session are short: your money sentences, the scripts you named, your translation rows, the three parts, the check-in number, and your shared why.
Money conversations go better on a schedule, when both of you are regulated, not at nine at night because a bill arrived. The Money Talk Container helps you set that up.
The money worksheets. All free, and fillable online at New Path Family. The practical side lives here, so the session can stay with the feelings.
Where money feelings come from
Why Money Is Hard (and It’s Not Willpower)
Talking about money together
Whose Job Is the Money? (Without Keeping Score)
Building the system
The Bill & Due-Date Safety Net
If money is being used to control
If this is hard to do. Money is one of the places shame lives. If the worksheets feel like too much this month, there is no need to push through them. Spend some time with your partner talking about what makes it hard, and share the feelings that come up: the fear, the embarrassment, the old arguments. That conversation is part of the work.
Is one of us the responsible one with money?
No. Neither of you is the responsible one, and neither of you is the fun-ruiner. Money styles usually start as survival strategies: for a saver, the style is often protecting safety, and for a spender, aliveness or relief. In the session, each of you gets to hear what the other's money style is really trying to give them.
Does ADHD or autism decide our money style?
Not on its own. In one study, adults with ADHD more often called their money decisions avoidant or spontaneous, and in interviews some autistic adults described a strong drive to stay in control. But either partner can run either way, and an AuDHD partner can be a saver on Monday and a spender on Friday.
Will the therapist build us a budget?
No budget is built in the money session, and no bank statements come out. NCCC does not do financial planning, and there is no one right system. The module offers one example among many, shared money for bills and goals plus fun money spent with no questions asked, and your therapist helps you talk it through and find what fits both of your brains.
What if only one of us can see the accounts?
Often the reason is simple: one partner took over the accounts years ago, and the other stopped looking. Then the first job is making everything visible to both of you. If money is being used as leverage, or either of you is afraid of the other, you can tell your therapist on your own, and joint sessions pause until you are safe.
Your workbook
Your answers save to this device only - we cannot see a word of what you write. This one follows the worksheet: your money style, where it came from, what it protects, one translation, and your shared why.
Our money styles
Yours, not your partner's.
Which fits you more? — A now-brain: I spend to feel alive, A future-brain: I only feel safe with a plan, Both, depending on the week, Neither, really
How I relate to money, in a sentence
Where mine came from
My Money Story goes further, if you have time for it.
A line about money I heard growing up, and who said it
The money script that runs me most — Money is always about to run out, Spending soothes, I don't deserve nice things, Looking at it makes it worse, If I ignore it, it isn't real, Something else
What not knowing about my brain cost me, and what I can put down to my wiring rather than my character
What my style is protecting
Safety, aliveness, relief, or something else.
What my money style is really trying to give me
The translation
Then ask your partner whether the last part fits.
Something my partner does with money, what I have made it mean, and what it might actually be
Our shared money why
Not a figure. A thing.
One thing we both want our money to do for the life we are building
The belief about money I want to carry forward
Where this comes from
Every source below was checked against the published record. They are grouped by the kind of evidence they are, so the numbers may not run straight down the page — a number points back to where the source is used in the lesson.
Research discussion
The worksheet order, the two questions in step 4, the translation table, the access question and the three-part system are practice moves, developed in use with neurodiverse couples and not validated in a trial. The ours, mine and yours structure and the no-questions amount are borrowed from financial therapy, which developed them without a neurodivergence lens, and so is the idea of money scripts.3 The handbook of that field is in the general references below.
The evidence behind the moves is real but indirect. The ADHD study1 is a small clinical sample; the group differences in financial competence and future-oriented decision-making were large, and the self-report items on impulse buying and decision style are what the lesson leans on. The autistic study2 is twenty-one interviews and qualitative: it cannot say how common the careful pattern is, only that it exists. Neither study supports sorting people into a style by diagnosis, which is why the lesson says so.
The money script study3 is a survey of 422 adults that developed the Klontz Money Script Inventory; its links to income and net worth are correlations, in a sample that was not asked about neurodivergence. The financial infidelity study4 is consumer research; it does not test whether no-questions money reduces hiding, and the lesson infers that from the mechanism. The self-blame left by the years before diagnosis, and the way a money question can land as rejection, are patterns the practice sees; the lesson states them as such, without a study.
Who this research was done with. The studies behind this module, none of them of neurodiverse couples, drew heavily on white, comparatively well-off, English-speaking participants. If your household carries pressures those samples did not — money, immigration, racism, disability, unsafe housing — the practice still applies, but the room you are practicing in is harder. That is the room, not you.
Clinically reviewed by Harry Motro, PsyD, LMFT · California LMFT #53452 · Founder and Clinical Director, Neurodiverse Couples Counseling Center · Clinical supervisor · Updated September 28, 2026
Peer-reviewed research
1. Bangma DF, Koerts J, Fuermaier ABM, Mette C, Zimmermann M, Toussaint AK, Tucha L, Tucha O (2019) Financial decision-making in adults with ADHD. Neuropsychology, 33(8), 1065-1077. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000571 45 adults with ADHD and 51 healthy controls assessed with neuropsychological tests, standardized financial decision-making measures and self-report. The ADHD group reported less income, more often debts and less often a savings account; performed substantially lower on measures of financial competence, capacity and future-oriented decision-making; and reported more impulse buying and a more avoidant or spontaneous decision-making style. Numeracy partially mediated group differences on two measures. Limitation: small clinical sample; cross-sectional; cannot separate ADHD from its common co-occurring conditions.
2. Pellicano E, Hall G, Cai RY (2024) Autistic adults' experiences of financial wellbeing: Part II. Autism, 28(5), 1090-1106. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613231191594 Phase 2 of a sequential mixed-methods study: 21 autistic adults, 12 with high and 9 with low financial wellbeing, interviewed by an autistic researcher and analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis. Access to a stable income made the largest difference; social and family support shaped wellbeing; planning was often challenging, with participants naming organization, time management, narrow focus and emotion regulation; and participants reported a strong drive to stay in control and avoid unnecessary risk. Limitation: qualitative, 21 Australian adults; cannot estimate how common any pattern is.
3. Klontz B, Britt SL, Mentzer J, Klontz T (2011) Money beliefs and financial behaviors: Development of the Klontz Money Script Inventory. Journal of Financial Therapy, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.4148/jft.v2i1.451 Survey of 422 adults used to develop the Klontz Money Script Inventory, which identified four distinct patterns of money belief (money avoidance, money worship, money status and money vigilance). Three of the four were significantly associated with income and net worth, and demographic characteristics were associated with each scale. The authors describe money scripts as typically learned in childhood and often outside awareness. Limitation: cross-sectional and correlational; not a clinical or neurodivergent sample.
4. Garbinsky EN, Gladstone JJ, Nikolova H, Olson JG (2020) Love, lies, and money: Financial infidelity in romantic relationships. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz052 Defines financial infidelity as engaging in any financial behavior expected to be disapproved of by one's partner and intentionally failing to disclose it. Across ten laboratory studies, a field study and real bank-account data from a couples' money-management app, the authors developed and validated a Financial Infidelity Scale that predicted spending despite anticipated disapproval, preference for discreet payment methods and unmarked packaging, and concealment of account information. Limitation: consumer-research samples, not couples in treatment; it does not test whether a no-questions amount reduces hiding.
Further reading
• Klontz BT, Britt SL, Archuleta KL (Eds.) (2015) Financial Therapy: Theory, Research, and Practice. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08269-1 The handbook of the adjacent profession. Financial therapy developed the structures this module borrows, the separate and shared money and the discretionary amount that needs no justification, and the idea of money scripts, all without a neurodivergence lens. Limitation: an edited handbook, not a trial; the structures are clinical practice, not validated interventions.
Two money brains, and one system with a seat for each
The Neurodiverse Couples Counseling Center works with couples where one or both partners are autistic, ADHD or AuDHD. The money session looks at where each of your money styles came from and what each one protects, before anyone builds a budget. Therapy for clients in California, coaching worldwide, all by telehealth. A first conversation costs nothing.
Up next