Show the full module text
Module 12 — Competing Sensory Needs, Then and Now
The sensory worksheet about the house you grew up in, and the session that maps where your two nervous systems collide now.
Ask a couple what they fight about and you get money, chores, the in-laws. Ask them to describe a Saturday and you get the radio that is always on, the kitchen light, the restaurant you stopped going to. This module is about where those needs came from, and the session that maps where they collide now.
What this is about
Nobody calls any of that sensory. It gets called controlling, or fussy, or not making an effort. That last one does the most damage.
Many of the arguments a couple brings us are two nervous systems with different settings, sharing one house.
Optional, and recommended. This module and its worksheet are optional, like all of them. But if sensory issues were significant in the family you grew up in, we strongly recommend doing both.
A separate worksheet. Competing Sensory Needs is not part of the family-of-origin set. Your therapist sends it once they have heard how a Saturday goes in your house. Each of you fills it in alone, about the house you grew up in. It takes well under an hour and asks about nobody’s wounds.
The first page is a grid: six rows, one for each sense, and a column for each person in your family. The senses are sound, sight, touch, movement, smell and taste, and interoception (the sense that tells you that you are hungry, cold or in pain). In each box goes one letter.
S is a seeker, who craved input.
A is an avoider, who was overwhelmed by it.
M is someone who missed it.
E is someone who noticed everything and never said so.
Three short sections follow: the clashes and how your family handled them, the labels your family used, and where the pattern shows up now. The worksheet is fillable online at New Path Family; save it there or send a copy to your therapist.
Nothing is scored and there is no right pattern; the grid puts your childhood house on one page as a set of nervous systems.
What happens in the session
Your therapist puts both childhood grids on the screen and works through the places where the letters clash.
How your family handled a clash is usually how you are handling it now.
Then the session turns to the house you live in now. A questionnaire is not enough here: adults who have spent thirty years adapting around a sensitivity stopped noticing long ago. So your therapist asks about scenes: a room, a time of day, and what happens in it.
The Sensory Session
1 Both grids, then the labels. Where the letters clash, how was it handled? What did your family call it, and what is it called now?
2 Four questions about your house now. Your kitchen at six in the evening. The room you avoid, and when. What you need after the family lunch or the store. What the two of you have stopped doing together.
3 What each of you goes looking for. Not what bothers you: what you need more of. Loud music, heat, pressure, movement, strong flavors. Seeking never looks like a problem, so nobody volunteers it.
4 Down the ladder, and the cost said out loud. For each clash: can it be separated, buffered, or scheduled? Compromise only when none of those works. Then we name who gives something up.
If you have been the easy-going one, this session asks about your needs. “I’m fine, I’m used to it” gets a second question.
The frame. There isn’t a normal setting here that one of you is deviating from. There are two settings, and they differ in different places. So we are solving a design problem, not deciding who is being difficult.
The kitchen. Walk me through your kitchen at six in the evening. Who is in there, what is on, what is the light doing, and who leaves?
The cost. In this arrangement, one of you is giving something up. Say what it is, out loud, and let it be heard.
Nothing here asks either of you to try harder or tolerate more.
Why compromise comes last
Compromise feels fair, and on a sensory clash it is the worst option.
Meeting in the middle on volume means the music sits at a level neither of you wants, permanently, and both of you resent it. So we work down a ladder; compromise is the bottom rung.
Separate comes first. Two spaces, and nobody tolerates anything. Two people comfortable in separate rooms spend more of the evening together than two people braced in one.
Buffer is next. Earplugs, a lamp instead of the ceiling light, a door that closes. Cheap, fast, and where most of the quick wins are.
Schedule is third. Same room, different hours, agreed in advance. A predictable noise costs far less than one that arrives unannounced.
Most couples arrive having lived on the bottom rung for years, and most of the clashes they bring can be solved two or three rungs higher.
The way this goes wrong. Here is the quiet house. Everyone agreed on the fix: television off, lights down, music stopped, for the partner who complained. Six months later the other partner is flat and withdrawn. Nobody asked what they needed more of, and a seeker in a silenced house is being starved.
Touch, and the bed
“Does he like being touched?” has no useful answer. A touch is at least six things: which kind, where, how much pressure, with or without warning, who starts it, and for how long.
One of you has been refused many times and concluded you are not wanted.
The other was failing one of six questions, usually the same one.
So your therapist writes down, in your own words, exactly which touch is welcome (the touch specification). A yes stops being a gamble.
Time counts too. The same touch is welcome in the morning and unbearable at night after a day of holding it together. That is capacity, not rejection, and your therapist names it that way.
Your therapist will also ask about the bed, because couples rarely raise it. Two people with different thresholds for heat, touch, noise and light are asked to do the hardest sensory negotiation in the house while asleep.
Sleeping apart is often the right answer.
The cost of trying it is almost always about what it seems to mean, not what it does. Many couples land on apart on weeknights, together on weekends.
Why we do it this way
Most of what people know about sensory sensitivity is about children, and many professionals still treat it as something you outgrow. Autistic adults report more sensory over-responsivity than other adults across sight, sound, touch, smell, taste and body position.1
The worksheet asks about your childhood house because that is where the labels were made, not because the differences ended there.
The usual mistake. One of you becomes the sensitive one. The house gets arranged around that person, and the other, never asked, becomes the easy-going one. Both halves are wrong. Almost every autistic adult who fills in a sensory profile scores in the extreme range somewhere, and the profiles vary strikingly from person to person.2
Where the two of you sit close together on a sense the room already works; where you sit far apart there is no middle setting, and those rows are the whole design problem.
Why M and E are on the grid. The child who missed it was read as not caring.
The child who endured it was read as fine.
Look for E in your partner’s column. The partner who sits through television at a volume that hurts is not comfortable. They are paying for it quietly, and it shows up at bedtime.
The labels did not stay in that house. Too sensitive grows up into controlling.
Obnoxious grows up into not making an effort.
When autistic adults describe their senses in their own words, much of it is about the situation: whether they have any control over the input, and what the people around them do.3 That was true in the house you grew up in, and it is true in your marriage.
The bed matters more than the rest combined. Couples report more conflict after poor nights of sleep, and when one partner has slept badly both of them read each other less accurately the next day.4
A bad sleeping arrangement is upstream of most of what you argue about the next morning.
After the session
The buffer rung works fast, on purpose. Often, within a week, a clash that has run for years is simply gone.
The two of you have solved a problem without anybody being wrong.
The rest of the program is built on that experience. The list of what you stopped doing together gets one item back: one restaurant, chosen for the corner table and the early hour, with the recovery time planned for. If it goes well, a second. The workbook below is the room interview, done at home.
If the grid made you wonder about your own column, there is a sensory profile screener in the free self-discovery course. It was built in-house, with no norms behind it, so take it for the items that make you stop rather than for the number.
The one thing, if that is all you have. If the whole sheet is too much this month, fill in one column: your own six letters. Then answer one question: which room do you avoid, and when?
Your workbook
Your answers save to this device only - we cannot see a word of what you write. This one is the room interview, done at home, before or after the session.
The room interview
About the house you live in now. Scenes, not traits. Your answers save to this device only.
Your six letters now, as an adult, in this order: sound, sight, touch, movement, smell and taste, interoception (S seeker, A avoider, M misses it, E endures it, or a blank)
Your kitchen at six in the evening: who is in it, what is on, what is the light doing, and who leaves?
Which room do you avoid, and when?
After the biggest regular thing - the family lunch, the store, the school pickup - how long do you need afterward? — Minutes, About an hour, The rest of the evening, Into the next day, I have never let myself have any
What have the two of you stopped doing together? All of it.
What do you go looking for? Not what bothers you - what you need more of
The bed, and the cost
Two questions your therapist will ask. Answer them here first.
Are the two of you sleeping well in the same bed? — Yes, Not really, and neither of us has said so, No, and we have talked about it, We already sleep apart and it works, We already sleep apart and it hurts
In the arrangement you are most likely to make: who gives up what, and has it been said out loud?
Where this comes from
Every source below was checked against the published record. They are grouped by the kind of evidence they are, so the numbers may not run straight down the page — a number points back to where the source is used in the lesson.
Research discussion
The worksheet, the four room questions, the ladder and the touch specification are practice tools. They were developed in use rather than validated, they are presented to couples on that basis, and they are revised roughly once a year as the practice learns. What the research does establish is that sensory differences in autistic adults are common, large, and different from one person to the next.
The adult over-responsivity finding1 comes from a large online survey, cross-sectional and self-report. It shows the difference is present in adulthood and goes with autistic traits, not that it persists unchanged from childhood in any one person. The profile study2 is a small sample on a single questionnaire, and its message is the variability between people. It does not on its own show one person seeking in one channel and avoiding in another. That is a clinical observation, and the M and E letters rest on it.
The own-words study3 is forty-nine adults, co-produced with autistic stakeholders, and it is cited for what it set out to fill in: seeking and under-reactivity, and the themes of control and other people. It cannot say how common any of it is.
The sleep study4 is two studies of couples from the general population, not neurodiverse couples. It measured conflict and how accurately partners read each other after poor sleep. It did not test sleeping arrangements, so it supports the claim that sleep is upstream of conflict and not the claim that separate beds fix anything. That second claim is clinical experience.
Who this research was done with. The couples studies behind most of this module drew heavily on white, comparatively well-off, English-speaking participants. If your household carries pressures those samples did not — money, immigration, racism, disability, unsafe housing — the practice still applies, but the room you are practicing in is harder. That is the room, not you.
Peer-reviewed research
1. Tavassoli T, Miller LJ, Schoen SA, Nielsen DM, Baron-Cohen S (2014) Sensory over-responsivity in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 18(4), 428-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361313477246 Online survey of 221 autistic and 181 non-autistic adults using a sensory processing scale, the Autism Spectrum Quotient and a reasoning test. Autistic adults reported more sensory over-responsivity across visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory, gustatory and proprioceptive domains, and over-responsivity correlated positively with autistic traits across and within groups. Limitation: cross-sectional and self-report, so it shows the difference is present in adulthood rather than tracking it from childhood, and the abstract gives no effect sizes.
2. Crane L, Goddard L, Pring L (2009) Sensory processing in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Autism, 13(3), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361309103794 Autistic adults completed the Adult/Adolescent Sensory Profile, a 60-item self-report questionnaire. 94.4 percent reported extreme levels of sensory processing on at least one of its four quadrants, with striking within-group variability: different individuals showed very different, yet similarly severe, patterns. The authors conclude that sensory processing differences extend across the lifespan. Limitation: a small sample on a single questionnaire (sample sizes are not stated in the abstract), and the variability it reports is between people, not a demonstration that one person seeks in one channel and avoids in another.
3. MacLennan K, O'Brien S, Tavassoli T (2022) In our own words: The complex sensory experiences of autistic adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52(7), 3061-3075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05186-3 Mixed-methods study, co-produced with autistic stakeholders, of 49 autistic adults who completed an online survey about their sensory experiences. Content analysis across modalities covered hyperreactivity, hyporeactivity and seeking; thematic analysis produced four themes: Outcomes, Control, Tolerance and management, and The role of other people. Limitation: a qualitative account of what sensory reactivity differences can involve; it cannot say how common any experience is, and no numerical results are given in the abstract.
4. Gordon AM, Chen S (2014) The role of sleep in interpersonal conflict: Do sleepless nights mean worse fights? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(2), 168-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613488952 Two studies. In a 14-day daily experience study, participants reported more conflict in their romantic relationships following poor nights of sleep. In a laboratory conflict conversation, one partner's poor sleep was associated with a lower ratio of positive to negative affect, self-reported and observed, and with decreased empathic accuracy for both partners; conflict resolution occurred most when both partners were well rested. The effects were not explained by stress, anxiety, depression, relationship satisfaction, or the partner being the source of the poor sleep. Limitation: general-population couples rather than neurodiverse couples, sample sizes not stated in the abstract, and sleeping arrangements were not tested.
Two nervous systems, one house, and a design problem instead of a verdict
The Neurodiverse Couples Counseling Center works with couples where one or both partners are autistic, ADHD or AuDHD. The sensory session maps both of you, not the one who complains, and works down the ladder before it reaches for a compromise. Therapy for clients in California, coaching worldwide, all by telehealth. A first conversation costs nothing.
Up next
Module 13 — The Labels You Carried